Lawler: An “Update” to the “Excess” Supply of Housing

by Bill McBride on 12/26/2012 04:42:00 PM

CR: Housing economist Tom Lawler sent me the following long piece that suggests a large number of the excess vacant housing supply has been absorbed.

Housing economist Tom Lawler writes: An “Update” to the “Excess” Supply of Housing; How Much Has the Number of Vacant Homes Fallen Since April 1, 2010 (through December 1, 2012?)

It is over 2 1/2 years since the Decennial Census 2010’s “snapshot” of the US population and housing market on April 1, 2010. While private housing analysts are still awaiting the result of research by Census analysts on the reasons for the sharply different results of Census 2010 compared to other Census surveys (e.g., the ACS and the HVS), I thought it might be useful to review some numbers since the Census was taken.

On the housing production from, Census estimates suggest that from April 2010 to November 2012, housing completions plus manufactured housing units totaled about 1.817 million (an ann ualized pace of about 681 thousand).

There are no data on the net loss to the housing stock over this period. Prior to the release of Census 2010 results many folks thought that the net loss to the housing stock last decade was averaging around 200 â€" 250 thousand units a year, but the decennial Census results suggested a much smaller number. But for fun, let’s assume that the net loss in the housing stock since the decennial Census has been about 400,000, or an annualized rate of 150,000.

Such a number would imply that the housing stock at the end of November/beginning of December increased by about 1.417 million, or an annualized rate of about 531 thousand.

Now what about the number of households (or occupied housing units)? Sadly, here there are no good, reliable data to count on. For 2012, there are two sources of “estimates” on US “households,” both based on supplement surveys of the Current Population Survey. One source is the Housing Vacancy Survey, which assumes that (1) the Census’ Population Division estimates of the US housing stock are correct; and (2) the HVS’ estimates of the % of the housing stock are correct. Census 2010 results (and to a lesser extent ACS results) strongly indicated, of course, that the latter assumption is not correct: the HVS appears to overstate significantly the share of the housing stock that is vacant, with the overstatement growing over the past few decades.

With that caveat in mind, the HVS estimates are that the number of US households averaged 114.916 million in September 2012, compared to an average of 112.633 million in March-April of 2010. The official Census 2010 household estimate for April 2010 was 116.716 million. Assuming that the HVS estimates for the last 3 months of 2012 show similar YOY growth as the previous few months, and “grossing up” the totals to be consistent with Census 2010 totals, the HVS estimates might suggest household growth from April 1, 2010 to December 1, 2012 of about 2.62 million, or an annualized rate of about 983 thousand. This is a “low” estimate.

Another source of an “estimate” of US households in 2012 is the Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey. This annual survey, taken over February, March, and April with an “expanded” sample size relative to the “normal” monthly CPS and HVS surveys, purportedly produces “estimates” of the number of US households in March of each year that are consistent with (1) civilian non-institutionalized population estimates, and (2) survey results. The CPS/ASEC, in essence, is “controlled” to population estimates, as opposed to the CPS/HVS, which is “controlled” to housing stock estimates.

In the latest CPS/ASEC for March, 2012, the estimate of the number of US households was 121.084 million, which is a staggering 4.368 million higher than the official Census 2010 estimate for April 1, 2010. The CPS/ASEC revised household estimate for March, 2011, based on Census 2010 population controls, was 119.927 million, up from the previous 118.682 million in the 2011 report based on Census 2000 population controls. Census did not provide updated March 2010 estimates based on Census 2010 population controls.

It should be noted, however, that the CPS/ASEC household “estimates” are not “controlled” to Census 2010 household estimates, but instead are “controlled” to population estimates, and the CPS/ASEC survey results appear to significantly overstate US households (they also aren’t consistent with decennial Census estimates of the household, as opposed to civilian non-institutionalized, population estimates). I “guesstimate” that a CPS/ASEC household estimate consistent with Census 2010 household population estimates and recently-released 2012 household population estimates by age group for March, 2012 would be about 119.6 million, and t hat an estimate for December 1, 2012 using updated household population estimates would be about 120.5 million, about 3.8 million higher than the Census 2010 estimate for April 1, 2010, and an annualized increase of about 1.425 million. This is a “high” to “very high” estimate.

Another alternative would be to look at updated estimates of the household population (available through December 1, 2012¹), and then make certain assumptions either about household size (very crude) or make certain assumptions about “headship” rates by age group. Below is a table with some data to start with.

A few things are worth noting: first, overall population growth is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of about 0.74% since the decennial Census was taken, and the household population is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 0.76%. This growth rate is significantly lower than last decade’s average, partly reflecting lower immigration levels and partly reflecting lower birth rates.

The population of adults â€" which is more important in terms of household growth, is estimated to have grown at a more rapid annualized rate. E.g., the 25+ year household population is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of about 1.09%.

< td>0.22%

	Â	Â	Â	Annualized % Chg
Â	4/1/2010	Â	12/1/2012	Â
Resident Population	308,747,508	Â	314,918,615	0.74%
Household Population	300,758,251	Average Household Size	306,855,515	0.76%
Households	116,716,292	2.577	Â	Â
Household Population by Age Group	Â	Â	Â	Â
15-24	40,202,045	Â	40,442,554
25-34	40,005,898	Â	41,371,961	1.27%
35-44	40,277,153	Â	39,666,291	-0.57%
45-54	44,288,729	Â	43,274,284	-0.87%
55-64	36,068,290	Â	38,485,646	2.46%
65-74	21,429,316	Â	24,256,989	4.76%
75+	17,380,962	Â	18,231,315	1.81%
25+ Years	199,450,348	Â	205,286,486	1.09%
Households by Age Group	Â	Headship Rate*	Â	Â
15-24	5,400,799	13.43%	Â	Â
25-34	17,957,375	44.89%	Â	Â
35-44	21,290,880	52.86%	Â	Â
45-54	24,907,0 64	56.24%	Â	Â
55-64	21,340,338	59.17%	Â	Â
65-74	13,504,517	63.02%	Â	Â
75+	12,315,319	70.86%	Â	Â
* Households divided by Household Population

[Note: the difference between the “resident” population and the “household” population is the number of people estimated to be living in “group quarters,” usually broken out between “institutionalized” (including correctional facilities for adults, juvenile facilities, and nursing/skilled nursing facilities) and “non-institutionalized” (including college/university student housing, military quarters, and other group housing).]

There are two “Q&D” ways one might “gueestimate” the number of households on December 1, 2012: one â€" very quick, extremely dirty â€" would be to assume that the average household size had remained the same. That approach, which doesn’t take into account shifts in the age distribution of the population, would lead to an estimate of 119.028 million, up 2.366 million from April 1, 2010.

A second approach would be to assume that the “headship” rates for different age groups on December 1, 2012 was about the same as on April 1, 2012. Using that “Q&D” approach, one would get an estimate of the number of households on December 1, 2012 of about 120.283 million, up 3.567 million from April 1, 2010.

So … let’s assume that a “very low” case for household growth from April 1, 2010 is around 2.4 million (annual rate of 900 thousand); a “high” case is 4.0 million (annual rate of 1.5 million), and a “base” case is around 3.2 million (annual rate of around 1.2 million). What might these numbers mean for the number of vacant homes as of December 1, 2012 compared to April 1, 2010?   Here is a table showing (rounded) what the numbers might look like.

Changes from April 1, 2010 to December 1, 2012 (millions of units)
Â	Low	Base	High
Household Increase	2.4	3.1	3.8
Housing Production*	1.8	1.8	1.8
Net Housing Units Lost	0.4	0.4	0.4
Housing Units	1.4	1.4	1.4
Vacant Housing Units	-1.0	-1.7	-2.4
*Housing Completions plus Manufactured Housing Placements (with November estimate)

Under a “very low end” estimate of household growth, the number of vacant units since April 1, 2010 would be down by about a million. Under a “very high end” estimate of household growth, the number of vacant housing units would be 2.4 million lower. And a “not too unrealistic” estimate of household growth would imply that the number of vacant housing units was down by about 1.7 million.

Now, does a 1.7 million decline in the number of vacant homes for sale since April 1, 2010 seem plausible? Well, if that were the case one would probably expect that the number of homes for sale, for rent, and held as REO would be down significantly. So, let’s take a look at some available numbers.

NAR estimates that the number of existing homes for sales declined from 3.09 million at the end of March 2010 to 2.03 million at the end of November 2012, a decline of about 1.06 million. Realtor.com’s listings numbers fell by a similar amount. Obviously not all homes listed for sale are vacant, but a significant % are vacant.

Census estimates that the number of completed new SF homes for sales declined from 92 thousand at the end of March 2010 to 40 thousand at the end of October 2012, a decline of 52 thousand.

The REO inventory of Fannie, Freddie, FHA, and private-label ABS, combined with an estimate of the REO inventory of FDIC-insured institutions (based on $ carrying amounts and estimates of the average carrying balance) declined from about 531 thousand from the end of March 2010 to about 367 thousand at the end of September 2012, a decline of about 164 thousand. Some, but probably less than 40%, of these REO properties were listed for sale.

There aren’t good, aggregate data on the number of homes for rent: HVS has estimates, but comparisons with decennial Census data indicate that HVS rental vacancy rates not only are overstated, but also that the overstatement has grown over time. Given that caveat, the HVS estimates show that the number of homes for rent declined from a first-half 2010 average (to come close to an April 1 estimate) of about 4.458 million to a third-quarter 2012 average of 3.809 million, a declin e of about 649 thousand. The actual decline is probably larger.

Hmmmm…..gosh, a decline in the number of vacant homes of about 1.7 million since April 1, 2010 sure SEEMS plausible!

But wait: if the number of vacant homes since Census 2010 has been that large, then that would imply a sizable reduction in the “excess” supply of housing â€" enough so that, if true, one should have expected to see stability in, or even in many areas even increases in, home prices in 2012! Could that really be true? (CR note: see previous posts!)

Looking ahead to the next few years, the likely growth in population by age groups suggests that household formations should average about 1.3 million a year, with some upside if headship rates rebound in any meaningful fashion.

¹ Actually, “estimates” are available through July 1, 2012, and data from August 1, 2012 through December 1, 2012, are short-term “projections.”

CR Note: This was from h ousing economist Tom Lawler.

Some Bullish 2013 House Price Forecasts

by Bill McBride on 12/14/2012 09:07:00 PM

From the WSJ: Home Prices Could Jump 9.7% in 2013, J.P. Morgan Says

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. expects U.S. home prices to rise 3.4% in its base-case estimate and up to 9.7% in its most bullish scenario of economic growth. Standard & Poor’s, which rates private-issue mortgage bonds, on Friday said it expects a 5% rise in 2013.

The J.P. Morgan analysts boosted their base-case estimate from 1.5% ...

I think house prices will increase further in 2013 based on supply and demand (there is little supply, however I think it is possible that inventory will bottom in 2013), but I doubt we will see a 9.7% price increase next year on the repeat sales indexes.

The WSJ's Nick Timiraos makes an amusing comment on Twitter: "All these analysts forecasting monster home price gains were forecasting moderate declines a few months ago."

At the beginning of the year, the consensus was that house prices would decline for at least another year. When I posted The Housing Bottom is Here in early February, many people were surprised. How views change!

BLS: CPI declines 0.3% in November, Core CPI increases 0.1%

by Bill McBride on 12/14/2012 08:40:00 AM

From the BLS: Consumer Price Index - November 2012

The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) declined 0.3 percent in November on a seasonally adjusted basis, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 1.8 percent before seasonal adjustment. The gasoline index fell 7.4 percent in November; this decrease more than offset increases in other indexes, resulting in the decline in the seasonally adjusted all items index.
...
The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.1 percent in November after a 0.2 percent increase in October. ... The index for all items less food and energy rose 1.9 percent over the last 12 months, slightly lower than the October figure of 2.0 percent. The food index has risen 1.8 percent over the last 12 months, and the energy index has risen 0.3 percent.

I'll post a graph later today after the Cleveland Fed releases the median and trimmed-mean CPI. This was below the consensus forecast of a 0.2% decrease for CPI, and below the consensus for a 0.2% increase in core CPI.

The decrease in CPI was mostly due to the recent decline in gasoline prices.  On a year-over-year basis, CPI is up 1.8 percent, and core CPI is up 1.9 percent.  Both below the Fed's target.

Ten Economic Questions for 2013

by Bill McBride on 12/24/2012 06:43:00 PM

Here are some questions I'm thinking about ...

1) US Policy: This is probably the biggest downside risk for the US economy in 2013. I assume some sort of fiscal agreement will be reached soon, but how much austerity will be included? What will happen with the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)? What about emergency unemployment benefits? What about extending the mortgage relief for debt forgiveness (important for short sales)?

And what about other policy in 2013 such as the "default ceiling" (aka debt ceiling)? In 2011, the threat of a US government default slowed the economy to almost a standstill for a month. Right now the White House is taking the Ronald Reagan approach (when the Democrats pulled a similar reckless stunt) and they are saying President Obama will only sign a clean debt ceiling bill. Good.  Hopefully default is off the table, but you never know.

2) Economic growth: Heading into 2013 there are still significant downs ide risks from the European financial crisis and from U.S. fiscal policy. Will the U.S. economy grow in 2013? Or will there be another recession?

3) Employment: How many payroll jobs will be added in 2013? Will we finally see some pickup over the approximately 2 million private sector job creation rate of 2011 and 2012?

4) Unemployment Rate: The unemployment rate is still elevated at 7.7% in November. For the last two years I've been too pessimistic on the unemployment rate because I was expecting some minor bounce back in the participation rate. Instead the participation rate continued to decline. Maybe 2013 will be the year the participation rate increases a little, or at least stabilizes. Economists at the SF Fed wrote about this last week: Will the Jobless Rate Drop Take a Break?

The recent recession was unusual in its depth and its duration. Labor market conditions have remained difficult for a long time. As a result, large numbers of discouraged workers have stopped looking for jobs. A big unknown is whether these workers will stay out of the labor force permanently or enter as the economy recovers. If these workers join the labor force, increasing participation could have a major impact on the unemployment rate in the coming years.

What will the unemployment rate be in December 2013?

5) Inflation: The Fed has made it clear they will tolerate a little more inflation, but currently the inflation rate is running below the Fed's 2% target. Will the inflation rate rise or fall in 2012?

6) Monetary Policy: Currently the Fed is planning to buy $85 billion in Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities per month as part of the open-ended QE3. Will the Fed continue all year at this pace? Or will the Fed increase their purchase rate? Or will the Fed decrease their purchase rate, stop these purchases, or even sell some securities?

7) House Prices: It now appears house prices, as measured by the national repeat sales indexes, bottomed in early 2012? What will happen with house prices in 2013?

8) Housing Inventory: Over the last few years, we've seen a dramatic plunge in existing home inventory. Will inventory bottom in 2013?

9) Residential Investmen t: Residential investment (RI) picked up in 2012, with new home sales and housing starts increasing 20% or so.  Note: RI is mostly investment in new single family structures, multifamily structures, home improvement and commissions on existing home sales. This still leaves RI at a historical low level. How much will RI increase in 2012?

10) Europe and the Euro: What will happen in Europe in 2013? Will a country leave the euro this coming year, will the euro-zone implode, or will 2013 be the bottom for the euro-zone economies?

I'm sure there are other key questions, but these are the ones I'm thinking about now.

Review of My 2012 Forecasts

by Bill McBride on 12/24/2012 11:52:00 AM

Near the end of each year I try to post a few general forecasts for the coming year. The purpose is to try to provide an overview of how I think the economy will perform.

Some years there are BIG calls, like in late 2006 when I predicted a recession would start in 2007 (made it by one month!). Another “BIG” call example was in early 2009 when I started writing about a second half economic recovery.

Most of my forecasts are more mundane, as an example for 2012 GDP, I wrote:

“my guess is growth will be sluggish relative to the slack in the system, but above the 2011 growth rate. “

Right now “sluggish” looks correct, and if Q4 2012 GDP is at or above 1.6% (annualized), then 2012 will actually be better than 2011 (Q4 over Q4 of previous year). But even if I had been wrong, I find it useful to write down some forecasts and then to understand why I was right or wrong. (I’d say my guess on growth was about right).

Of course my BIG call for 2012 was that house prices would finally find a bottom as measured by the national repeat sales indexes (see: The Housing Bottom is Here). In early 2012, I wrote:

“My guess is that nominal house prices, using the national repeat sales indexes and not seasonally adjusted, will bottom in March 2012.”

As of right now â€" with prices up almost 5% seasonally adjusted since early this year â€" the house price bottom call looks correct.

Note: When I wrote that post, the consensus was house prices would decline throughout 2012. Since then the consensus has changed and most analysts now think prices bottomed early this year.

I did get a couple of forecasts wrong in 2012. For the unemployment rate, I wrote:

A couple of predictions.

• The participation rate will rise slightly in 2012 and probably end the year in the 64.0% to 64.5% range.

• The unemployment rate will still be in the 8% to 9% range in December 2012.

Even though I’ve been arguing that most of the decline in the participation rate over the last few years was due to changing demographics (as opposed to cyclical due to the recession), I still thought we’d see some slight increase in participation in 2012 â€" and that didn’t happen.

Click on graph for larger image.

The participation rate fell to 63.6% in November, and the unemployment rate declined to 7.7%. (Participation rate is the blue line. This is the percentage of the working age population in the labor force).

Since I was wrong on the participation rate, my forecast for the unemployment rate was too pessimistic.

I was also too pessimistic on foreclosures. I wrote:

Will foreclosure activity increase in 2012?

This is a difficult question. There are several significant policy changes in the works: 1) a possible Mortgage Settlement, 2) HARP refinance (the automated program starts in March), and 3) a REO to rental program. It appears the overall goal of these policy changes is to reduce the large backlog of seriously delinquent loans while, at the same time, not flood the housing market with distressed homes.

My guess is the policy changes will all be announced in the next few months, and that foreclosure activity will increase significantly.

The policy changes were announced, but the lenders focused more on modifications and short sales than foreclosures, and foreclosure activity has only picked up recently in some judicial foreclosure states.

On employment I was close. I wrote:

My guess is private employment will increase around 150 to 200 thousand per month on average in 2012; about the same rate as in 2011.

With over 13 million unemployed workers - and 5.6 million unemployed for more than 26 weeks - adding 2 million private sector jobs will not seem like much of job recovery for many Americans. Hopefully I'm too pessimistic.

That was about right. The economy has added 1.7 million private sector jobs through November (over 1.8 million including the preliminary benchmark revision).

A key forecast â€" that appears correct â€" was that the drag from state and local governments would end around mid-year. I wrote:

It is looking like there will be less drag from state and local governments in 2012, and that most of the drag will be over by the end of Q2 (end of FY 2012). This doesn't mean state and local government will add to GDP in the 2nd half of 2012, just that the drag on GDP and employment will probably end. Just getting rid of the drag will help.

This graph shows total state and government payroll employment since January 2007. State and local governments lost 129,000 jobs in 2009, 262,000 in 2010, and 230,000 in 2011. So far in 2012, state and local governments have actually added a few jobs, and state and local government employment increased by 4,000 in November.

Note: The dashed line shows an estimate including the benchmark revision.

It appears most of the state and local government layoffs are over, however the Federal government layoffs are ongoing. 

This graph shows the contribution to percent change in GDP for residential investment and state and local governments since 2005.

The blue bars are for residential investment (RI), and RI was a significant drag on GDP for several years. Now RI has added to GDP growth for the last 6 quarters (through Q3 2012).

The red bars are for state and local governments. Although not as large a negative as the worst of the housing bust (and much smaller spillover effects), this decline has been relentless and unprecedented. The good news is the drag appears to be ending, and state and local governments actually added to GDP growth in Q3 2012 - for the first time since Q3 2009.

A few more forecasts - On monetary policy I wrote :

• I expect the Fed will change their communication strategy and add a likely future path of the Fed Funds rate to the quarterly economic forecasts.

• I think QE3 is likely, but more towards mid-year - and [timing] is data dependent.

The Fed introduced the new communication strategy, and then changed it again near the end of 2012. They waited a little longer than I expected, and the FOMC announced QE3 in September.

And on inflation:

The bottom line is the inflation rate will probably stay low in 2012 with high unemployment and low resource utilization. I expect QE3 to be announced before mid-year, and that will probably keep the inflation rate near the Fed's target (as opposed to falling further). But I don't see inflation as a significant threat in 2012.

The inflation outlook was correct. It is stunning how many analysts and policymakers have consistently been wrong on inflation for the last several years - and they still haven't changed their views or models!

And on Europe and the Euro:

So once again my guess is the euro will survive another year without losing any countries (Assuming a Greek debt deal). There will be plenty of blowups along the way, but I think the impact on the US economy will be fairly minimal.

I was pessimistic on Europe, but less pessimistic than many others. And once again Europe made it through another year.

All and all the economy evolved about as I expected in 2012. I’ll try to post some forecasts for 2013 soon, but I’ll wait until we see the details of the fiscal agreement. Policy matters â€" and the key downside risk for the US economy in 2013 is rapid austerity.

Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 841 Institutions

by Bill McBride on 12/22/2012 06:20:00 PM

Note: The first unofficial problem bank list was published in August 2009 with 389 institutions. The number of unofficial problem banks grew steadily and peaked at 1,002 institutions on June 10, 2011. The list has been declining since then.

This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for Dec 21, 2012.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

As expected, the OCC released its enforcement actions through mid-November this week. For the week, there were eight removals and four additions to the Unofficial Problem Bank List. After the changes, the list holds 841 institutions with assets of $313.3 billion. A year ago, the list held 973 institutions with assets of $397.6 billion.

The OCC terminated actions against National Bank of Kansas City, Overland Park, KS ($640 million); First Community Bank, National Association, Sugar Land, TX ($610 million); RiverWood Bank, Bemidji, MN ($156 million); The Midland National Bank of Newton, Newton, KS ($132 million); and Texas Republic Bank, National Association, Frisco, TX ($76 million).

The following three banks solved their problems by finding a healthier merger partner: The Community Bank, A Massachusetts Cooperative Bank, Brockton, MA ($317 million); Premier Bank, Tallahassee, FL ($272 million); and Stone County National Bank, Crane, MO ($81 million).

The O CC issued new actions against Los Alamos National Bank, Los Alamos, NM ($1.6 billion); Westbury Bank, West Bend, WI ($525 million); GCF Bank, Sewell, NJ ($314 million); and Home Loan Investment Bank, F.S.B., Warwick, RI ($196 million). Keen readers will know that Los Alamos National Bank is making its second appearance on the list after being removed in April 2012 when the OCC terminated an action issued in January 2010.

Next week, we look for the FDIC to release its actions through November but to shut it down as far as closings go. Wishing all a Merry Christmas and may you find a safe & sound bank under your tree.

Earlier:
• Summary for Week Ending Dec 21st
• Schedule for Week of Dec 23rd

Fiscal Agreement Update

by Bill McBride on 12/23/2012 10:33:00 AM

A few obvious points on the "fiscal cliff": 1) It is about the deficit shrinking too quickly next year, 2) there is no "drop dead" date and an agreement in early January still seems likely (the sites and TV stations with countdown times are embarrassing themselves), and 3) entitlements are not part of the "cliff" (although it was possible some changes might be part of an agreement).

Clearly there is going to be more austerity in the US at the Federal level next year. How much is unclear.

From Ezra Klein at Wonkblog: Obama’s “small deal” could lead to bigger tax increases

The talk in Washington now is about a “small deal.” That would likely include the Senate tax bill [to extend tax cuts for anyone making less than $250,000], some policy to turn off at least the defense side of the sequester and a handful of other policies to blunt or delay various parts of the fiscal cliff.

That’s not a very good deal for the short-term health of the economy.

This means the payroll tax cuts would expire (something I've expected) and tax rates for those making more than $250,000 would increase (also expected). There are many other issues - the medicare "doc" fix, mortgage debt relief, emergency unemployment benefits and on and on - that still need to be addressed.

It is hard to guess the impact on the economy until we see the details.

And an interesting article from the NY Times: How Party of Budget Restraint Shifted to ‘No New Taxes,’ Ever

On a Saturday afternoon in October 1990, Senator Pete V. Domenici turned from a conversation on the Senate floor, caught the eye of a clerk by raising his right hand and voted in favor of a huge and contentious bill to reduce federal deficits. Then he put his hand back into his pocket and returned to the conversation.

It was the end of an era, although no one knew it then. It was the last time any Congressional Republican has voted for higher income taxes.
...
In the early 1980s, majorities of Congressional Republicans voted for a pair of deficit deals orchestrated by President Ronald Reagan, even though tax increases accounted for more than 80 percent of the projected reductions.

This shift in the Republican party (to no taxes ever) is why I think an early January agreement is likely. In my first post on the fiscal agreement, I wrote: "Given that the top marginal tax rate will increase - and that certain politicians can't vote for any bill with a tax increase - the agreement will probably be voted on in January after the Bush tax cuts expire." That may seem weird, but it is the current state of politics.

Earlier: Chicago Fed National Activity Index improves, Kansas City Fed Mfg Survey shows contraction

by Bill McBride on 12/21/2012 06:51:00 PM

A couple of reports from earlier this morning:

• The Chicago Fed released the national activity index (a composite index of other indicators): Economic Activity Increased in November

Led by improvements in production-related indicators, the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) increased to +0.10 in November from â€"0.64 in October. Two of the four broad categories of indicators that make up the index increased from October, but only the production and income category made a positive contribution to the index in November.

The index’s three-month moving average, CFNAI-MA3, increased from â€"0.59 in October to â€"0.20 in Novemberâ€"its ninth consecutive reading below zero. November’s CFNAI-MA3 suggests that growth in national economic activity was below its historical trend. The economic growth reflected in this level of the CFNAI-MA3 suggests subdued inflationary pressure from economic activity over the coming year.

This graph shows the Chicago Fed National Activity Index (three month moving average) since 1967.

Click on graph for larger image.

This suggests economic activity increased, but growth was still below trend in November.

According to the Chicago Fed:

What is the National Activity Index? The index is a weighted average of 85 indicators of national economic activity drawn from four broad categories of data: 1) production and income; 2) employment, unemployment, and hours; 3) personal consumption and housing; and 4) sales, orders, and inventories.

A zero value for the index indicates that the national economy is expanding at its historical trend rate of growth; negative values indicate below-average growth; and positive values indicate above-average growth.

• From the Kansas City Fed: Tenth District Manufacturing Activity Declined Further

Tenth District manufacturing activity declined further in December, though by a smaller amount than in October or November. Factories’ production expectations were somewhat more optimistic than last month, but a higher share of firms plan to decrease employment in coming months. Approximately half of all contacts cited fiscal policy uncertainty as having impacted their hiring decisions. Price indexes mostly increased, particularly for future raw materials, with the increase driven heavily by food prices.

The month-over-month composite index was -2 in December, up slightly from -6 in November and -4 in October ... The employment index decreased from 22 to 13 after rebounding solidly last month.
...
“We saw factory activity decline for the third straight month, which many firms blamed on the uncertainty created by the fiscal cliff talks", said [Chad Wilkerson, vice president and economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City]. "Contacts still plan modest o utput expansion in the first half of 2012, but they now expect their employment to fall, before recovering later in the year.”

This showed contraction, but the index was slightly better than expected.

Summary for Week ending Dec 21st

by Bill McBride on 12/22/2012 08:01:00 AM

The economic data released this week was encouraging.  The November Personal Income and Outlays report suggests PCE might increase over 2% in Q4 - not great, but higher than most forecasts.

The housing numbers were solid.  Housing starts are on pace to increase about 25% this year, and, for existing homes, inventory is down sharply and conventional sales up. 

Other positives include Q3 GDP being revised up, the highest Architecture Billings Index since 2007, a rebound in the trucking index, a decline in the 4-week average of initial weekly unemployment claims, and another increase in builder confidence.

Manufacturing was still weak, but two of the three regional surveys were slightly better than expected.  A negative was consumer sentiment, and that is probably related to the "fiscal cliff" debate in Washington that is still showing no signs of progress. I expect an agreement, but not until early January (although it could happen sooner). Next w eek will be a light week for economic data, but there are two key housing reports - new home sales and Case-Shiller house prices.

Here is a summary of last week in graphs:

• Housing Starts at 861 thousand SAAR in November

Total housing starts were at 861 thousand (SAAR) in November, down 3.0% from the revised October rate of 888 thousand (SAAR).

A few key points:

• Housing starts are on pace to increase about 25% in 2012. This is a solid year-over-year increase, and residential investment is now making a positive contribution to GDP growth.

• Even after increasing 25% in 2012, the approximately 770 thousand housing star ts this year will still be the 4th lowest on an annual basis since the Census Bureau started tracking starts in 1959 (the three lowest years were 2009 through 2011). Starts averaged 1.5 million per year from 1959 through 2000, and demographics and household formation suggests starts will return to close to that level over the next few years. That means starts will come close to doubling from the 2012 level.

• Residential investment and housing starts are usually the best leading indicator for economy. Nothing is foolproof, but this suggests the economy will continue to grow over the next couple of years.

This was slightly below expectations of 865 thousand starts in November.

All Housing Investment and Construction Graphs
• Existing Home Sales in November: 5.04 million SAAR, 4.8 months of supply

The NAR reports: November Existing-Home Sales and Prices Maintain Uptrend

This graph shows existing home sales, on a Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) basis since 1993.

Sales in November 2012 (5.04 million SAAR) were 5.9% higher than last month, and were 14.5% above the November 2011 rate.

The next graph shows the year-over-year (YoY) change in reported existing home inventory and months-of-supply. Since inventory is not seasonally adjusted, it really helps to look at the YoY chang e. Note: Months-of-supply is based on the seasonally adjusted sales and not seasonally adjusted inventory.

Inventory decreased 22.5% year-over-year in November from November 2011. This is the 21st consecutive month with a YoY decrease in inventory.

Months of supply declined to 4.8 months in November.

This was above expectations of sales of 4.90 million. For existing home sales, the key number is inventory - and the sharp year-over-year decline in inventory is a positive for housing.

All current Existing Home Sales graphs
• Personal Income increased 0.6% in November, Spending increased 0.4%

The BEA released the Personal Income and Outlays report for November.

This graph shows real PCE by month for the last few years. The dashed red lines are the quarterly levels for real PCE. Personal income increased more than expected in November and PCE for October was revised up.

The "two month method" for estimating Q4 PCE suggests PCE will increase close to 2.2% in Q4 - more growth than most expect - although this estimate is probably a little high because PCE was strong in September. Still better than expected, and we are already seeing some upward revisions to Q4 GDP forecasts.

• AIA: Architecture Billings Index increases in November, "Strongest conditions since end of 2007"

Note: This index is a leading indicator primarily for new Commercial Real Estate (CRE) investment.

From AIA: Architecture Billings Index Signaling Gains for Fourth Straight Month

This graph shows the Architecture Billings Index since 1996. The index was at 53.2 in November, up from 52.8 in October. Anything above 50 indicates expansion in demand for architects' services.

This increase is mostly being driven by demand for design of multi-f amily residential buildings, but every building sector is now expanding. New project inquiries are also increasing. Note: This includes commercial and industrial facilities like hotels and office buildings, multi-family residential, as well as schools, hospitals and other institutions.

• Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims at 361,000

"In the week ending December 15, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 361,000, an increase of 17,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 344,000."

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims declined to 367,750.

The recent spik e in the 4 week average was due to Hurricane Sandy as claims increased significantly in NY, NJ and other impacted areas. Now, as expected, the 4-week average is back to the pre-storm level.

Weekly claims were slightly higher than the 359,000 consensus forecast.

All current Employment Graphs
• Final December Consumer Sentiment declines to 72.9

The final Reuters / University of Michigan consumer sentiment index for December declined to 72.9, down from the preliminary reading of 74.5, and was down from the November reading of 82.7.

This was below the consensus forecast of 75.0. The recent decline in sentiment is probably related to Congress and the so-called "fiscal cliff". This is similar to the sharp decline in 2011 when Congress threatened to force the US to default (not pay the bills).

I still think an agreement will be reached in early January - there is no drop dead date - but you never know. 

Empire State Manufacturing index indicates further contraction

by Bill McBride on 12/17/2012 08:40:00 AM

From the NY Fed: Empire State Manufacturing Survey

The December 2012 Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicates that conditions for New York manufacturers continued to decline at a modest pace. The general business conditions index was negative for a fifth consecutive month, falling three points to -8.1. The new orders index dropped to -3.7, while the shipments index declined six points to 8.8. At 16.1, the prices paid index indicated that input prices continued to rise at a moderate pace, while the prices received index fell five points to 1.1, suggesting that selling prices were flat. Employment indexes pointed to weaker labor market conditions, with the indexes for both number of employees and the average workweek registering values below zero for a second consecutive month. Indexes for the six-month outlook were generally higher than last month, although the level of optimism remained at a level well below that seen earlier this year.
...
The index for number of employees rose five points to -9.7, while the average workweek index declined three points to -10.8.
emphasis added

The general business condition index declined from -5.22 in November to -8.1 in December - the fifth consecutive negative reading. This was another weak manufacturing index and below expectations of a reading of 0.0.

LPS: Mortgage delinquencies increased in November, "In Foreclosure" Declines

by Bill McBride on 12/21/2012 10:55:00 AM

LPS released their First Look report for November today. LPS reported that the percent of loans delinquent increased in November compared to October, and declined about 9% year-over-year. Also the percent of loans in the foreclosure process declined further in November and are the lowest level since 2009.

LPS reported the U.S. mortgage delinquency rate (loans 30 or more days past due, but not in foreclosure) increased to 7.12% from 7.03% in October. Note: the normal rate for delinquencies is around 4.5% to 5%.

 The percent of loans in the foreclosure process declined to 3.51% from 3.61% in October. 

The number of delinquent properties, but not in foreclosure, is down about 10% year-over-year (434,000 fewer properties delinquent), and the number of properties in the foreclosure process is down 18% or 388,000 year-over-year.

The percent (and number) of lo ans 90+ days delinquent and in the foreclosure process is still very high, but the number of loans in the foreclosure process is now declining.

LPS will release the complete mortgage monitor for November in early January.

LPS: Percent Loans Delinquent and in Foreclosure Process
	Nov 2012	Oct 2012	Nov 2011
Delinquent	7.12%	7.03%	7.83%
In Foreclosure	3.51%	3.61%	4.20%
Number of properties:
Number of properties that are 30 or more, and less than 90 days past due, but not in foreclosure:	1,999,000	1,957,000	2,250,000
Number of properties that are 90 or more days deli nquent, but not in foreclosure:	1,584,000	1,543,000	1,767,000
Number of properties in foreclosure pre-sale inventory:	1,767,000	1,800,000	2,155,000
Total Properties	5,350,000	5,300,000	6,172,000

Friday: CPI, Industrial Production

by Bill McBride on 12/13/2012 08:27:00 PM

A couple of articles for light evening reading:

From Derek Thompson at the Atlantic: The Best Idea for the Debt Ceiling? Abolish It Forever. It really should be called the "default ceiling". I've been arguing for years - since Reagan demanded a clean bill from Congress in the '80s - that the default ceiling is just for political grandstanding.

From Suzy Khimm at the Wonkblog: New language, same findings: Tax hikes on the rich won’t cripple the economy. Here is the updated Congressional Research Service report. The data speaks.

Note: I still expe ct some sort of compromise to be reached on the "fiscal cliff", probably in early January.

Thursday economic releases:
• At 8:30 AM ET, the Consumer Price Index for November will be released. The consensus is for CPI to decrease 0.2% in November and for core CPI to increase 0.2%.

• At 9:15 AM, the Fed will release Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization for November. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in Industrial Production in November, and for Capacity Utilization to increase to 78.0%.

Another question for the December economic prediction contest (Note: You can now use Facebook, Twitter, or OpenID to log in).

Thursday: Existing Home Sales, Q3 GDP, Unemployment Claims, Philly Fed Mfg Survey

by Bill McBride on 12/19/2012 09:23:00 PM

First, Stan Collender reviews his budget predictions for 2012 and offers five predictions for 2013: Beyond The Fiscal Cliff: My Budget Crystal Ball For 2013. One of his 2012 predictions is still open:

The one prediction whose fate is still unknown is that I told readers not to be shocked if the only thing that happens in a lame-duck session is a deal that both extends the tax cuts and delays the sequester spending cuts until June 30, 2013, or beyond. We should know in a few weeks whether that happens.

My guess is some sort of deal will be worked out in early January, but Collender might be correct and everything could get extended for six months.

Wednesday economic releases:
• At 8:30 AM ET, The initial weekly unemployment claims report will be released. The consensus is for claims to increase to 359 thousand from 343 thousand last week. If correct, this would put the 4-week just above the low for the year.

• Also at 8:30 AM, the third estimate of Q3 GDP from the BEA. The consensus is that real GDP increased 2.8% annualized in Q3, up slightly from the 2.7% second estimate.

• At 10:00 AM, Existing Home Sales for November from the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The consensus is for sales of 4.90 million on seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) basis. Sales in October 2012 were 4.79 million SAAR. Economist Tom Lawler estimates the NAR will report sales at 5.10 million SAAR.

• Also at 10:00 AM, the Philly Fed Manufacturing Survey fo r December. The consensus is for a reading of minus 2.0, up from minus 10.7 last month (above zero indicates expansion).

• Also at 10:00 AM, the Conference Board Leading Indicators for November. The consensus is for a 0.2% decrease in this index.

• Also at 10:00 AM, FHFA House Price Index for October 2012. This was originally a GSE only repeat sales, however there is also an expanded index that deserves more attention. The consensus is for a 0.3% increase in house prices.

Another question for the December economic prediction contest (Note: You can use Facebook, Twitter, or OpenID to log in).

2013 Housing Forecasts

by Bill McBride on 12/19/2012 06:57:00 PM

Towards the end of each year I collect some housing forecasts for the following year.

Here was a summary of forecasts for 2012. Right now it looks like new home sales will be around 370 thousand this year, and total starts around 770 thousand or so.  Tom Lawler, John Burns and David Crowe (NAHB) were all very close on New Home sales for 2012.  Lawler was the closest on housing starts.

The table below shows several forecasts for 2013. (several analysts were kind enough to share their forecasts - thanks!)

From Fannie Mae: Housing Forecast: November 2012

From NAHB: Housing and Interest Rate Forecast, 11/29/2012 (excel)

I haven't worked up a forecast yet for 2013. I've heard there are some lot issues for some of the builders (not improved until 2014), and that might limit supply. In general I expect prices to increase around the rate of inflation, and to see another solid increase in 2013 for new home sales and housing starts.

Housing Forecasts for 2013
	New Home Sales (000s)	Single Family Starts (000s)	Total Starts (000s)	House Prices1
NAHB	447	641	910	1.6%
Fannie Mae	452	659	936	1.6%2
Merrill Lynch	466	Â	976	2.6%
Barclays	424	Â	988	4.8%3
Wells Fargo	460	680	990	2.6%
Moody's Analytics	500	820	1190	1.4%
1Case-Shiller unless indicated otherwise 2FHFA Purchase-Only Index 3Corelogic
2011 Actual	306	431	609	-4.0%
2012 Estimate	370	535	770	6.0%

Report: Housing Inventory declines 17% year-over-year in November

by Bill McBride on 12/18/2012 03:10:00 PM

From Realtor.com: November 2012 Real Estate Data

Flat list pricesâ€"a leading indicator of future house price trendsâ€"most likely signal a slowdown in the recent rate of house price appreciation. At the same time, historically low inventories suggest that significant price concessions on the part of home sellers may be coming to an end. How these potentially offsetting trends play out in the housing market will depend on a variety of factors, including potential buyers’ optimism regarding the continued strength of the overall economy.

The total U.S. for-sale inventory of single family homes, condos, townhomes and co-ops (SFH/CTHCOPS) dropped to its lowest point since 2007, with 1.674 million units for sale in November, down 16.87 percent compared to a year ago and more than 45 percent below its peak of 3.1 million units in September 2007, when Realtor.com began monitoring these markets. The median age of the inventory was also down by 11.4 percent on a year-over-year basis. However, the median list price in Novembe r ($189,900) was the same as it was a year ago despite the significant gains observed earlier in the year.
...
The national for-sale inventory of SFH/CTHCOPS in November (1,674,412) decreased (4.69 percent) from what it was in October and was down by 16.87 percent on an annual basis.

Note: Realtor.com only started tracking inventory in September 2007, but this is probably the lowest level in a decade.  On a month-over-month basis, inventory declined 4.7%, and declined in 133 of 146 markets.

Going forward, I expect to see smaller year-over-year declines simply because inventory is already very low.

The NAR is scheduled to report November existing home sales and inventory on Thursday, December 20th. A key number in the NAR report will be inventory, and inventory will be down sharply again year-over-year in November.

Wednesday: Housing Starts

by Bill McBride on 12/18/2012 08:16:00 PM

The following table shows annual starts (total and single family) since 2005, an estimate for 2012, and a 2013 "consensus" based on several forecasts.  I expect another solid growth year for housing starts in 2013 (with the usual Congressional caveats).

Note: from 1959 through 2000, housing starts average 1.5 million per year. The forecasts for 2013 would still be the sixth lowest year since 1959, with only 2008 through 2012 lower.

Housing Starts (000s)
	Total	Change	Single Family	Change
2005	2,068.3	---	1,715.8	---
2006	1,800.9	-12.9%	1,465.4	-14.6%
2007	1,355.0	-24.8%	1,046.0	-28.6%
2008	905.5	-33.2%	622.0	-40.5%
2009	554.0	-38.8%	445.1	-28.4%
2010	586.9	5.9%	471.2	5.9%
2011	608.8	3.7%	430.6	-8.6%
20121	770.0	26%	530.0	23%
20132	960.0	25%	660.0	25%
12012 estimated. 2early 2013 consensus based on several forecasts

Wednesday economic releases:
• At 7:00 AM ET, the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will release the mortgage purchase applications index.

• At 8:30 AM, Housing Starts for November will be released. The consensus is for total housing starts to decline to 865,000 Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) in November, down from 894,000 in October. Note: In November 2011, housing starts were above 700,000 (SAAR) for the first time in several years - it was considered a blow out month. Now expectations are for starts to be up more than 20% from that level.

• During the day: The AIA's Architecture Billings Index for November (a leading indicator for commercial real estate).

Another question for the December economic prediction contest (Note: You can use Facebook, Twitter, or OpenID to log in).

Tuesday: NAHB Home Builder Confidence

by Bill McBride on 12/17/2012 10:09:00 PM

Two more articles on the possible "fiscal cliff" deal:

From the NY Times: President Delivers a New Offer on the Fiscal Crisis to Boehner

The White House plan would permanently extend Bush-era tax cuts on incomes below $400,000, essentially meaning that only the top tax bracket, 35 percent, would rise to 39.6 percent.

The president’s plan would cut spending by $1.22 trillion over 10 years, an official said, $800 billion of it in programmatic cuts, and $122 billion by adopting a new measure of inflation that slows the growth of government benefits, especially Social Security.

From the WSJ: White House Revises Offer on Tax Rates in Deficit Talks

In President Barack Obama's latest budget proposal, the White House said it now would seek to raise tax rates on income above $400,000, a person familiar with the talks said. ...

In total, the plan would include $1.22 trillion in spending reductions, with $400 billion coming from changes to health-care programs, $200 billion from cuts to other mandatory spending programs, $100 billion in cuts coming from defense spending and another $100 billion coming from nondefense discretionary spending.

Tuesday economic releases:
• At 10:00 AM ET, The December NAHB Housing Market Index (HMI) survey will be released. The consensus is for a reading of 47, up from 46 in November. Although this index has been increasing sharply, any number below 50 still indicates that more builders view sales conditions as poor than good.

Fiscal Cliff: Chained CPI

by Bill McBride on 12/17/2012 07:32:00 PM

Ezra Klein at the WaPo WonkBlog wrote earlier today: A ‘fiscal cliff’ deal is near: Here are the details

Boehner offered to let tax rates rise for income over $1 million. The White House wanted to let tax rates rise for income over $250,000. The compromise will likely be somewhere in between. More revenue will come from limiting deductions, likely using some variant of the White House’s oft-proposed, oft-rejected idea for limiting itemized deductions to 28 percent. The total revenue raised by the two policies will likely be a bit north of $1 trillion. ...

On the spending side, the Democrats’ headline concession will be accepting chained-CPI, which is to say, accepting a cut to Social Security benefits.

Chained CPI is a relatively new series (started in 2002), and measures inflation at a slightly lower rate than CPI or CPI-W - and over time this would add up both for Social Security payments and also for revenue (tax brackets would increase slower using chained CPI than using currently).

From the BLS: Frequently Asked Questions about the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U)

Click on graph for larger image in graph gallery.

T he graph shows the year-over-year change in headline CPI, CPI-W, and chained CPI.

There isn't much difference on a year-over-year basis, but notice the blue line is mostly below the other two all the time. Those small differences add up over time as the following table shows.

This table shows the 10 year change in each measure (from Nov 2002 to Nov 2012) and the annualized change over that period. If we were using chained CPI instead of CPI-W over the last 10 years, Social Security benefits would be about 3.6% lower than they are now.

	10 Year Increase	Annualized
CPI (headline)	27.0%	2.42%
CPI-W (current)	27.7%	2.48%
CPI (chained)	24.1%	2.19%

LA area Port Traffic: Down in November due to Strike

by Bill McBride on 12/17/2012 11:51:00 AM

Note: Clerical workers at the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles went on strike starting Nov 27th and ending Dec 5th. The strike impacted port traffic for November, but traffic is expected to bounce back in December. The strike happened after the holiday shipping period, so the slowdown isn't expected to impact holiday related shopping.

I've been following port traffic for some time. Container traffic gives us an idea about the volume of goods being exported and imported - and possibly some hints about the trade report for November. LA area ports handle about 40% of the nation's container port traffic. Some of the LA traffic was routed to other ports, so this data might not be very useful this month.

The following graphs are for inbound and outbound traffic at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach in TEUs (TEUs: 20-foot equiv alent units or 20-foot-long cargo container).

To remove the strong seasonal component for inbound traffic, the first graph shows the rolling 12 month average.

Click on graph for larger image.

On a rolling 12 month basis, both inbound and outbound traffic are down slightly compared to the 12 months ending in October.

In general, inbound and outbound traffic has been mostly moving sideways recently.

The 2nd graph is the monthly data (with a strong seasonal pattern for imports).

For the month of November, loaded outbound traffic was down 7.5% compared to November 2011, and loaded inbound traffic was down 3% compared to November 2011.

Usually imports peak in the July to October period as retailers import goods for the Christmas holiday, so some decline in November was expected.

Unofficial Problem Bank list declines to 845 Institutions

by Bill McBride on 12/15/2012 06:20:00 PM

Note: The first unofficial problem bank list was published in August 2009 with 389 institutions. The number of unofficial problem banks grew steadily and peaked at 1,002 institutions on June 10, 2011. The list has been declining since then.

This is an unofficial list of Problem Banks compiled only from public sources.

Here is the unofficial problem bank list for Dec 14, 2012.

Changes and comments from surferdude808:

Similar to last week, the only changes this week to the Unofficial Problem Bank list were removals. In all, there were four removals, which leaves the list at 845 institutions with assets of $312.9 billion. A year ago, the list held 974 institutions with assets of $398.3 billion.

Oasis Bank, SSB, Houston, TX ($77 million) left the list through an unassisted merger and actions were terminated against WaterStone Bank, SSB, Wauwatosa, WI ($1.7 billion Ticker: WSBF); Essex Bank, Tappahannock, VA ($1.1 billion Ticker: BTC); and Northwestern Bank, Chippewa Falls, WI ($366 million). The failure tonight -- Community Bank of the Ozarks, Sunrise Beach, MO -- was not on the Unofficial Problem Bank List as an enforcement action could not be located on the FDIC website.

Next week, several changes should occur as the OCC will release its actions through mid-November 2012.

Earlier:
• Summary for Week Ending Dec 14th
• Schedule for Week of Dec 16th

CoStar: Commercial Real Estate prices decrease slightly in October, Up 6% Year-over-year

by Bill McBride on 12/13/2012 05:30:00 PM

From CoStar: Commercial Property Prices Show Little Movement in October Amid Economic Uncertainty

The two broadest measures of aggregate pricing for commercial properties within the CCRSIâ€"the equal-weighted U.S. Composite Index and the value-weighted U.S. Composite Indexâ€"saw very little change in the month of October 2012, dipping -0.1% and -0.8%, respectively, although both improved over quarter and year-ago levels. Recent pricing fluctuations likely signify a more cautious attitude among investors stemming from uncertainty over U.S. fiscal policy heading into 2013.
...
The number of distressed property trades in October fell to 14.8%, the lowest level witnessed since the first quarter of 2009. This reduction in distressed deal volume should result in higher, more consistent pricing, and lead to enhanced market liquidity, giving lenders more confidence to finance deals.

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph from CoStar shows the Value-Weighted and Equal-Weighted indexes. As CoStar noted, the Value-Weighted index is up 35.0% from the bottom (showing the demand for higher end properties) and up 6.1% year-over-year. However the Equal-Weighted index is only up 10.0% from the bottom, and up 5.9% year-over-year.

Note: These are repeat sales indexes - like Case-Shiller for residential - but this is based on far fewer pairs.

FNC: Residential Property Values increased 3.7% year-over-year in October

by Bill McBride on 12/15/2012 08:55:00 PM

In addition to Case-Shiller, CoreLogic, FHFA and LPS, I'm also watching the FNC, Zillow and several other house price indexes.

FNC released their October index data last night. FNC reported that their Residential Price Indexâ„¢ (RPI) indicates that U.S. residential property values increased 0.4% from September to October.

From FNC: Home Prices Up 0.4% in October; Year-Over-Year Growth Acceleration Continues

Based on recorded sales of non-distressed properties (existing and new homes) in the 100 largest metropolitan areas, the FNC 100-MSA composite index shows that home prices nationally were up 0.4% in October. This was the eighth consecutive month that prices moved higher, leading to a total appreciation rate of 5.1% year to date. The year-over-year growth has accelerated rapidly since first turning positive four months ago. Foreclosures as a percentage of total home sales were 17.6% in October, down from 26.7% at the beginning of the year or 23.5% a year ago.

The year-over-year trends continued to show improvement in October, with the 100-MSA composite up 3.7% compared to October 2011. The FNC index turned positive on a year-over-year basis in July - that was the first year-over-year increase in the FNC index since year-over-year prices started declining in early 2007 (over five years ago).

Click on graph for larger image.

This graph is based on the FNC index (four composites) through October 2012. The FNC indexes are hedonic price indexes using a blend of sold homes and real-time appraisals.

The key is the indexes are now showing a year-over-year increase in dicating prices probably bottomed early this year.

The October Case-Shiller index will be released on Wednesday, Dec 26th.

Earlier:
• Summary for Week Ending Dec 14th
• Schedule for Week of Dec 16th

Summary for Week ending Dec 14th

by Bill McBride on 12/15/2012 08:24:00 AM

The key US economic story of the week was the FOMC announcement of thresholds for raising the Fed Funds rate based on the unemployment rate and inflation.  Also the FOMC expanded QE3 by an additional $45 billion per month starting in January (some people are calling it QE4, but that isn't consistent - the FOMC expanded an earlier QE).  This was a significant change in Fed communication, and the change allows the FOMC to drop the date language from the FOMC statement.  If the economy improves quicker than the forecast, then investors will adjust their estimate of timing (or the opposite). The Fed also made it very clear they will tolerate a little more inflation in the near term.

The economic data showed some bounce back following Hurricane Sandy.  The retail report increased 0.3% (less than forecast though), and industrial production increase 1.1% (more than forecast).  And initial weekly unemployment claims continued to decline following the Sandy spike. 

This bounce back shows the declines in October were storm related.

The austerity debate (aka "Fiscal cliff) still showing no signs of progress.  But I don't expect agreement until early January (although it could happen sooner).  Next week will be very busy with several key housing reports.

Here is a summary of last week in graphs:

• Retail Sales increased 0.3% in November

Click on graph for larger image.

On a monthly basis, retail sales increased 0.3% from October to November (seasonally adjusted), and sales were up 3.7% from November 2011. The change in sales for October was unrevised at a 0.3% decline.

This graph shows reta il sales since 1992. This is monthly retail sales and food service, seasonally adjusted (total and ex-gasoline).

Retail sales are up 24.5% from the bottom, and now 8.8% above the pre-recession peak (not inflation adjusted)

The second graph shows the year-over-year change in retail sales and food service (ex-gasoline) since 1993.

Retail sales ex-gasoline increased by 4.0% on a YoY basis (3.7% for all retail sales).

This was at the consensus forecast of no change ex-autos, but below the consensus forecast for total retail sales of a 0.6% increase in November. Retail sales are still sluggish, but generally trending up.

• Trade Deficit increased in October to $42.2 Billion

The Dept of Commerce reported: "[T]otal October exports of $180.5 billion and imports of $222.8 billion resulted in a goods and services deficit of $42.2 billion, up from $40.3 billion in September, revised. October exports were $6.8 billion less than September exports of $187.3 billion. October imports were $4.9 billion less than September imports of $227.6 billion."

Both exports and imports decreased in October. US trade has slowed recently.

Exports are 9% above the pre-recession peak and up 1.0% compared to October 2011; imports are 4% below the pre-recession peak, and down 0.8% compared to October 2011.

The second graph shows the U.S. trade deficit, with and without petroleum, through October.

The blue line is the total deficit, and the black line is the petroleum deficit, and the red line is the trade deficit ex-petroleum products.

Oil averaged $99.75 in October, up from $98.88 per barrel in September. The trade deficit with China increased to $29.5 billion in October, up from $28.1 billion in October 2011. Most of the t rade deficit is still due to oil and China.

The trade deficit with the euro area was $8.9 billion in October, up from $7.1 billion in October 2011. It appears the eurozone recession is impacting trade.

• Industrial Production increased 1.1% in November, Bounces back following Hurricane Sandy

From the Fed: "Industrial production increased 1.1 percent in November after having fallen 0.7 percent in October. The gain in November is estimated to have largely resulted from a recovery in production for industries that had been negatively affected by Hurricane Sandy, which hit the Northeast region in late October."

This graph shows Capacity Utilization. This series is up 11.6 percentage points from the record low set in June 2009 (the series starts in 1967).

Capacity utilization at 78.4% is still 1.9 percentage points below its average from 1972 to 2010 and below the pre-recession level of 80.6% in December 2007.

The second graph shows industrial production since 1967.

Industrial production increased in November to 97.5. This is 17% above the recession low, but still 3.2% below the pre-recession peak.

IP was above expectations due to the bounce back following Hurricane Sandy. Overall IP has only up 2.5% year-over-year.

All current manufacturing graphs

• Key Measures show low inflation in November

The Cleveland Fed released the median CPI and the trimmed-mean CPI.

This graph shows the year-over-year change for four key measures of inflation. On a year-over-year basis, the median CPI rose 2.2%, the trimmed-mean CPI rose 1.9%, the CPI rose 1.8%, and the CPI less food and energy rose 1.9%. Core PCE is for October and increased 1.7% year-over-year.

On a monthly basis, median CPI was above the Fed's target at 2.3% annualized. However trimmed-mean CPI was at 1.6% annualized, and core CPI increased 1.4% annualized. Also core PCE for October incre ased 1.6% annualized. These measures suggest inflation is mostly below the Fed's target of 2% on a year-over-year basis.

The Fed's focus will probably be on core PCE and core CPI, and both are at or below the Fed's target on year-over-year basis. Also, the FOMC statement this week indicated the Fed will tolerate an inflation outlook "between one and two years ahead" of 2 1/2 percent.  So, with this low level of inflation and the current high level of unemployment, the Fed will keep the "pedal to the metal".

• BLS: Job Openings "little changed" in October

This graph shows job openings (yellow line), hires (dark blue), Layoff, Discharges and other (red column ), and Quits (light blue column) from the JOLTS.

Notice that hires (dark blue) and total separations (red and light blue columns stacked) are pretty close each month. This is a measure of turnover.  When the blue line is above the two stacked columns, the economy is adding net jobs - when it is below the columns, the economy is losing jobs.

Jobs openings increased in October to 3.675 million, up from 3.547 million in September. The number of job openings (yellow) has generally been trending up, and openings are up about 8% year-over-year compared to October 2011.

Quits increased in October, and quits are up 4% year-over-year. These are voluntary separations. (see light blue columns at bottom of graph for trend for "quits").  The trend suggests a gradually improving labor market.

All current employment graphs
• Weekly Initial Unemployment Claims decline to 343,000

The dashed line on the graph is the current 4-week average. The four-week average of weekly unemployment claims declined to 381,500.

The recent sharp increase in the 4 week average was due to Hurricane Sandy as claims increased significantly in NY, NJ and other impacted areas. Now, as expected, the 4-week average is almost back to the pre-storm level.

Weekly claims were lower than the 370,000 consensus forecast.

Note: We use the 4-week average to smooth out noise, but following an event like Hurricane Sandy,  the 4-week average lags the event. It looks like the average should decline next week to around 370,000 or so.

All current Employment Graphs